A. Biographical information about the author must be considered when evaluating literature.
B. A text and its author text are unrelated.
C. It is possible to distill meaning from a work based on the author’s politics.
D. Authorial intent must be considered when evaluating literature.
A. It has little relationship to the colonization of asian countries by the west.
B. It illustrates the fundamental political equality of all nations.
C. It was produced by western scholarship.
D. Its literature is less proud that that of the west.
A. Formalism
B. Structuralism
C. Poststructuralism
D. Marxism
A. History comprises the essential framework for the performance of literary analysis
B. Politics and the economy are the most important factors in literary analysis
C. Biography is essential to literary analysis
D. Psychoanalysis is critical to literary analysis
A. A concept associated with russian formalism
B. An idea explored by viktor shklovsky
C. A term that describes the capacity of art to counter the effects of habit
D. All of the above.
A. A figure of judgment
B. Religious belief
C. A witness
D. Psychological treatment
A. The effect of literature in enlightening the human mind
B. The effect of modern society on human suffering
C. The effect of the economy on women’s concerns
D. The effect of the unconscious mind on the conscious self
A. Reject all previous modes of literary theory
B. Focus on a return to traditional critical methods
C. Make use of different literary theories in order to develop new theories
D. Work only with ideas developed by post-marxist theorists
A. Strange attractors are mysterious forces that are entirely random.
B. Strange attractors are complex forces that are determined by the laws of physics.
C. Strange attractors are mysterious forces that are both random and determined.
D. Strange attractors are complex forces that are entirely random.
A. It offers a strong outline for how theory can be conducted in the 21st century.
B. It should not be read or considered by any student or scholar.
C. It offers some valid ideas and critiques, but its author is not entirely trustworthy.
D. It offers a strong counterpoint to jacques derrida’s notion of deconstruction.